On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 16 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Jim Schaad wrote: > >> I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in the >> document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into the >> registry as well when it is published. > > > I agree . I didn't call that out because that one _was_ mentioned in the > last call announcement.
Sorry to chime in late. I thought this was covered in the shepherd report, but didn't realize there were 2 downrefs. What do I need to do at this point? We don't need to do another last call anymore, right? Sorry I am not remembering the new procedure. Thanks, Kathleen > > Thanks, > > Ben. > > >> >> Jim >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM >>> To: The IESG <[email protected]> >>> Cc: [email protected]; Jim Schaad >>> <[email protected]>; >>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: >>> (with >>> COMMENT) >>> >>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >>> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection >>> >>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>> email >>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>> introductory >>> paragraph, however.) >>> >>> >>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>> >>> >>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/ >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> COMMENT: >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does not >>> appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in the >>> downref >>> registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I >>> don't suggest >>> any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people >>> hadn't already >>> noticed. >>> > -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
