On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 12:43 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17 Aug 2016, at 11:39, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Ben Campbell <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On 16 Aug 2016, at 21:43, Jim Schaad wrote: >>> >>>> I don't know when it needs to be done, but the other down reference in >>>> the >>>> document is also an algorithm document which I hope will get into the >>>> registry as well when it is published. >>> >>> >>> >>> I agree . I didn't call that out because that one _was_ mentioned in the >>> last call announcement. >> >> >> Sorry to chime in late. I thought this was covered in the shepherd >> report, but didn't realize there were 2 downrefs. What do I need to >> do at this point? We don't need to do another last call anymore, >> right? Sorry I am not remembering the new procedure. > > > We have been discussing the relaxation of the (repeated) last call > requirement, both in the IESG and in Barry's draft. I'm not sure that > discussion has reached it's conclusion. I'm not sure what we should do in > the interim (this my comment about not suggesting any particular course of > action.) > > By the way, I think both were mentioned in the shepherd write up, but not in > the last call announcement.
OK, the shepherd report was there prior to last call, so hopefully that is enough to not require a second last call? Thanks, Kathleen > > Ben. > > >> >> Thanks, >> Kathleen >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Ben. >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Jim >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Ben Campbell [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2016 7:16 PM >>>>> To: The IESG <[email protected]> >>>>> Cc: [email protected]; Jim Schaad >>>>> <[email protected]>; >>>>> [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: >>>>> (with >>>>> COMMENT) >>>>> >>>>> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for >>>>> draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05: No Objection >>>>> >>>>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >>>>> email >>>>> addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >>>>> introductory >>>>> paragraph, however.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please refer to >>>>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >>>>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> COMMENT: >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >>>>> I note that the reference to RFC7748 is a normative downref that does >>>>> not >>>>> appear to be mentioned in the last call announcement. It’s not in the >>>>> downref >>>>> registry, but since it's an algorithm spec, it probably should be. I >>>>> don't suggest >>>>> any particular course of action; I merely bring it up in case people >>>>> hadn't already >>>>> noticed. >>>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best regards, >> Kathleen -- Best regards, Kathleen _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
