On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 08:30:44AM -0500, Orie Steele wrote: > This seems good to me. > > We had planned to request registry entries for JOSE algorithms that match > the COSE algorithms for: > > - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-dilithium/ > - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-falcon/ > - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-cose-sphincs-plus/ > > Seems like there might be some overlap in objectives, aside from updating > test vectors, one of the most recent changes we have made was to update the > kty values to "MLWE". > ... seems like perhaps we should align to the latest NIST terminology? > Naming is hard.
All three should use the same kty value, because all three have the same kind of keys, and kty actually means the kind of key. The kty will be a new one, because it is not the same as any existing kind. My earlier proposal for the name was "AKP". -Ilari _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
