I also support extending the charter to support maintenance. On Fri, Sep 1, 2023 at 7:49 AM Michael Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support extending the charter in this manner. > > -- Mike > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* jose <[email protected]> on behalf of Michael Prorock < > [email protected]> > *Sent:* Friday, September 1, 2023 6:37:57 AM > *To:* John Mattsson <[email protected]> > *Cc:* JOSE WG <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: [jose] Recharter to include basic JOSE maintenance > > I support the extension. I understand the constraint to items that have > undergone public review as well and believe that that process is highly > valuable. > > Mike Prorock > CTO - mesur.io > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2023, 08:14 John Mattsson <john.mattsson= > [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We (the chairs) have discussed with our AD Roman. We forgot to include > basic JOSE maintenance in the charter when the WG got reopened. The > current charter is silent on the topic. It’s definitely an obvious > oversight. We think it is best to do a recharter as soon as possible to > fix this. > > We suggest adding something like the draft text below to the end of the > current > charter. The suggested text borrows a lot from the COSE and IPSECME > charters. The first step is to get consensus in the working group. Please > comment on this thread. > > Cheers, > > John, for the chairs > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > *The JOSE working group will also maintain the JOSE standard and > facilitate* *discussion of* *clarifications, improvements, and extensions > to JWS, JWE, JWA,* *and JWK. The WG will evaluate, and potentially adopt, > documents dealing with algorithms* *that would fit the criteria of being > IETF consensus algorithms.* *Potential candidates would include those > algorithms that have been evaluated by* *the CFRG and algorithms which > have gone through a public review and evaluation* *process such as was > done for the NIST SHA-3 algorithms.* *Potential candidates would not > include national-standards-based algorithms* *that have not gone through > a similar public review process.* > > > > *This group is chartered to work on the following deliverables:* > > > > *- Document registering cryptographic algorithm identifiers that fully > specify the cryptographic operations to be performed.* > > *- Document describing the use of the NIST algorithm ML-KEM in JOSE.* > > *- Document describing the use of the NIST algorithm ML-DSA in JOSE.* > > *- Document describing the use of the NIST algorithm SLH-DSA in JOSE.* > > *- Document describing the use of the NIST algorithm NL-DSA in JOSE.* > > *- One or more documents describing the proper use of algorithms.* *These > algorithms must meet the requirements outlined above.* > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose > > _______________________________________________ > jose mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
