On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 at 18:20, Ilari Liusvaara <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2025 at 07:46:58AM +0100, Filip Skokan wrote: > > Hello Tiru, > > > > > PQ/T HPKE for JWE will be updated to use the "OKP" key type, consistent > > with existing HPKE usage in JWE. > > > > Can you please elaborate? Existing OKP/EC registrations cannot be used to > > represent the draft-ietf-hpke-pq-03 > > <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-hpke-pq-03.html> keys, not > > their public composite component, nor the private seed component. No > > P-256/P-384/X25519 JWK parser could deal with those values if they were > > OKP. AKP is perfectly fitting for this. OKP is not. > > Firstly, OKP not just can represent keys like that, it was _designed_ > to do that. > > The JWE implementation I am working on is capable of dealing with such > OKP JWK keys, and this is done without any extra code. > > And secondly, AKP is not fitting for this. Earlier I thought it AKP > would fit this purpose, but then I tried implementing it... The > encryption side is fine, the decryption side is not. > Could you please elaborate on the specific problem you encountered on the decryption side ? -Tiru > > > > > -Ilari > > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
