Petr Nejedly napsal(a): > Dirk Stöcker napsal(a): >> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Frederik Ramm wrote: >> >>> Gerv also hinted at the fact that JOSM is written in a way that is >>> somewhat untypical for Java, and whenever a newcomer to JOSM programming >>> said "this is all bullshit let's refactor it wholesale" I told them to >>> please find another project to refactor wholesale. I always thought that >>> the peculiar way in which JOSM is done has a lot going for it and makes >>> it easy to work with the code. > > When we're at it, I'm not sure the way josm is written makes it any easier > to work with the code. Using accessors is the standard way every java > programmer > understands and the code clutter is not much of an argument. > Moreover, josm uses unusual L10N way (I must admit that for a reason this > time, > though not a strong one) and unusual (and harder for anybody writing DataSet > modification actions, easier to break) undo system.
Well, I should know better than to (re)start a flamewar and leave for a vacation :-) I'll try to answer comments/questions relevant to josm-ng later today... -- Petr "Nenik" Nejedly, NetBeans/Sun Microsystems, http://www.netbeans.org 355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI, but an incredible simulation! _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
