On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Stefan wrote: > You want to increase quality by removing information? Are you sure? At best > you will achieve a decrease in the sac_scale usage. > > If any, add more information to josm, not less. If the description is > misleading, then change the description. Add examples. Add links to the > wiki. > > Relying on the users to actively search information because it is withhold > from him on purpose? Doesn't sound encouraging to me. > > I see your point, but if you look at the template it's not possible to put a long description in the list of values for sac_scale. And the current "information" is misleading, so the idea has been "better none than wrong". There is already a link to the wiki at the bottom of the template window, which links to "path" and from there to "sac_scale".
If somebody can tell me how, I would also add a link to the sac_scale directly at the list of values for sac_scale, please advise. And we are already relying on the users to actively search for the meaning of tracktype = gradeN, so this seems to work ok and is feasible. I'm also not totally happy with this solution, but we didn't come to any better one during the discussion. br, Georg _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
