While I know Mike was being a little bit trollish here, I think it may actually make sense to introduce the possibility of different URL(s) for read and write operations. This would allow us to (optionally) take a small portion of the API load off the DB server and put it on one of the XAPIs that are coming online.
What're your thoughts on this? Is it worth the extra complexity? On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Mike Dupont <jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com > wrote: > looks like we will also need to improve on josm to manage multiple > connections to different osm servers and its merging ability. > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > when the API is switched to license change phase 3, any attempt to open > a > > changeset by someone who hasn't yet either agreed to, or rejected, the > > contributor terms will be met with a 403 Forbidden error code. > > > > Will JOSM display the content of that error message to the user (so that > > the user knows why they got the message and that they need to log in to > > openstreetmap.org etc.etc.)? > > > > Should we make an effort to catch the error in order to allow a > > translation? > > > > Bye > > Frederik > > > > -- > > Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > josm-dev mailing list > > josm-dev@openstreetmap.org > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev > > > > > > -- > James Michael DuPont > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania flossk.org > flossal.org > _______________________________________________ > josm-dev mailing list > josm-dev@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev > _______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
