or maybe, like the other proposals:
.toggleClass("A", "B", "C")
and it would flip through the results.
--John
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Along the same lines, we have .addClass(), .removeClass(), .toggleClass(),
> but no .swapClass() . Not sure if you want to add another method, but it is
> kind of nice to be able to do something like $('div').swapClass('old',
> 'new') instead of $('div').removeClass('old').addClass('new').
> I'm ambivalent about it, but thought I'd bring it up since we're sort of
> brainstorming.
>
> --Karl
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 2:54 PM, John Resig wrote:
>
> I've heard requests for that a lot - the ability to toggle text,
> toggle values, toggle attributes, toggle css.
>
> I wonder if something like this could be done:
> .text("value A", "value B")
> .val("value A", "value B")
> .css("display", "none", "block")
>
> and it sets the value to to opposite of what's currently shown. Just a
> thought.
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Karl Swedberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> It's funny you mention this with the val() example, because I just wrote
>
> something similar today, but using text():
>
> var $toggleInfo = $('#toggleInfo');
>
> $toggleInfo.text( $toggleInfo.text() == 'hide contact info' ? 'bring back
>
> contact info' : 'hide contact info' );
>
> Kind of ugly.
>
> Can't think of anything else at the moment, but will send them along if I
>
> bump across anything.
>
> Well, I can think of plenty of places where *my* code is inelegant, but not
>
> where jQuery is to blame.
>
> --Karl
>
> ____________
>
> Karl Swedberg
>
> www.englishrules.com
>
> www.learningjquery.com
>
>
>
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 1:59 PM, John Resig wrote:
>
> I'm curious: Are there any pieces of code that use jQuery, right now,
>
> that you feel are unelegant or ugly? (Presumably ones that've already
>
> been optimized to the best of their ability.)
>
> One area of improvement that I was thinking of was something along the lines
>
> of:
>
> // ugly
>
> $("#foo").val( $("#bar").val() );
>
> // a bit better
>
> $("#foo").val( $("#bar") );
>
> this would be an easy change, just make .attr() do something like:
>
> if ( arg.jquery )
>
> val = arg.val() || arg.text() || "";
>
> Any other thoughts? I wonder if there are common cases that could be
>
> improved with some simple code additions to core.
>
> --John
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
