I meant this syntax ( $("#id").val(another jQuery Object) ) is a
little confused, at least incompatible with living syntax of jQuery.
( .append(jQuery Object) )
Brandon's way seems better, is it a selective clone() function?
Maybe we expand this too much, just return val() || text() from $
("#id") is enough. :D
On Sep 27, 2:58 am, "John Resig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > $("#one").html( $("#two") );
> > == $("#one").html( $("#two").html() ); or == $("#one").html( $
> > ("#two").val() || $("#two").text() ); ?
>
> I don't propose changing .html(). You can already do:
> $("#jq-header").html( $("#jq-content") )
>
> It's equivalent to doing:
> $("#jq-header").empty().append( $("#jq-content") )
>
> (which works)
>
> > What about:
> > $("#one").css("color",$("#two")) == $("#one").css("color", $
> > ("#two").css("color") )
>
> Sure, this one is understandable.
>
> > $("#one").bind("click",$("#two")) == $("#one").bind("click", click
> > function of $("#two") )
>
> I'm not sure what you're shooting for here. Maybe something like:
>
> $("#one").bind("click", $("#two")) ==
> $("#one").bind("click", function(){ $("#two").trigger("click"); });
>
> But that reminds me. I've been wanting this for a long time:
>
> $("#one").click(false);
>
> Which is equal to:
>
> $("#one").click(function(){ return false; });
>
> --John
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
