Any feature that requires knowledge of CS is a no-go in my book :P
-- Yehuda
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eh, nothing, got it wrong.
>
> We could just save all these methods on a special object.
>
> jQuery("#test").hide("slow", jQuery.curry.show("slow") );
>
> The name could be changed of course.
>
> Or renamed methods (probably bad option)
>
> jQuery("#test").hide("slow", jQuery.curriedShow("slow") );
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> > It is indeed. You can't expect parameters though and you could get
>> conflict
>> > with the actual parameters sent by the caller.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you're referring to - are you referring to a bug in
>> the code? Do you have an example?
>>
>> --John
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Ariel Flesler
> http://flesler.blogspot.com
>
> >
>
--
Yehuda Katz
Developer | Engine Yard
(ph) 718.877.1325
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
