> I agree with you, just wanted to through some ideas into the mix, but
> do you agree that this is "unelegant code"
>
> $('#foo').fadeOut('normal',function(){ $(this).remove(); });
>
> Do you have any suggestions to improve it? I think the last option I
> provided is the most realistic and I think that making it clear that
> you may only apply a single jquery method without arguments is within
> reason. It is just a shortcut, and you can use a whole function
> wrapper if you want to do something else.
One idea that I had was a special jQuery object that produces a
wrapped function, something like:
$("#foo").fadeOut("normal", jQuery.self.remove());
More complicated:
$("#foo").fadeOut("normal",
jQuery.self.hide("fast",
jQuery.self.remove()));
That wouldn't be "that hard" to implement (imo) - any interest? I
could probably code something up if there is.
--John
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
