Maybe It'd be better to simply make that private (as john proposed). On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Jörn Zaefferer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > queued or next is fine, the ugly part is "anim". Either use the full > word, nextAnimation(), or something different. > > Jörn > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, markus.staab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> maybe queuedAnim() would be a better name for nextAmin() >> >> On 30 Okt., 01:54, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3539 >>> >>> Thoughts ? >>> >>> -- >>> Ariel Fleslerhttp://flesler.blogspot.com >> > >> > > > >
-- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
