Actually.. I think private is bad, the (actual) nextAnim() is indeed needed if you're sticking functions into the fx queue, else it will get stuck.
So.. what could be the name ? I tried nextAnimation and it's gross and not jquery-ish. Has to be one, short word like every other method. Maybe just re add that behavior for the case where the 'fx' queue is used, but that could be confusing... -- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com On Oct 30, 10:12 am, "Jörn Zaefferer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > queued or next is fine, the ugly part is "anim". Either use the full > word, nextAnimation(), or something different. > > Jörn > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 1:37 PM, markus.staab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > maybe queuedAnim() would be a better name for nextAmin() > > > On 30 Okt., 01:54, Ariel Flesler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>http://dev.jquery.com/ticket/3539 > > >> Thoughts ? > > >> -- > >> Ariel Fleslerhttp://flesler.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
