Yeah, I figured that's what was happening. An older version of Sizzle used caching to improve performance - but that ended up negatively affecting the performance of normal DOM manipulation, so it was removed.
No need to upload your suite - I can see what was happening now! But thanks for the clarification. --John On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > thanks for your answer john, i used an older sizzle version v0.9 now i > replaced it with newest sizzle and now its nearly as fast as jquery > 1.3rc1 > sizzle: 315ms / jquery 1.3: 328ms > are there any changes in sizzle which make sizzle 0.9.1 about 3x > slower then version 0.9 in ff 3.0 and 2.x ? > slickspeed version is from your sizzle github repository downloaded > with sizzle 0.9 in december. > i can upload it this evening. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
