ok thanks for your explanation john.
On 12 Jan., 16:42, "John Resig" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yeah, I figured that's what was happening. An older version of Sizzle
> used caching to improve performance - but that ended up negatively
> affecting the performance of normal DOM manipulation, so it was
> removed.
>
> No need to upload your suite - I can see what was happening now! But
> thanks for the clarification.
>
> --John
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 10:39 AM, [email protected]
>
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > thanks for your answer john, i used an older sizzle version v0.9 now i
> > replaced it with newest sizzle and now its nearly as fast as jquery
> > 1.3rc1
> > sizzle: 315ms / jquery 1.3: 328ms
> > are there any changes in sizzle which make sizzle 0.9.1 about 3x
> > slower then version 0.9 in ff 3.0 and 2.x ?
> > slickspeed version is from your sizzle github repository downloaded
> > with sizzle 0.9 in december.
> > i can upload it this evening.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
