Convenience is certainly one - but in our experience the YUI Compressor has simply worked better and more reliably. The fact that they provide a JAR file to execute against makes it very simple for us to integrate into our development process.
--John On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:44 AM, KidsKilla <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > It's just interesting: is there any reason (except of convenience) to > use YUI instead of /packer/ ? > > Packer 3.1 > jQuery 54 865 > gripped 20,91 Kb (21 408 bytes) > ==================== > YUI 2.4.2 > jQuery 55 272 > gripped 21,47 Kb (21 985 bytes) > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
