this (work in progress) : http://m2.lab-au.com/

navigate sequence: theory > writing > articles

thank you for your time John!

Alexandre


On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 9:25 PM, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So looking at your page - your ULs are, technically, not visible.
> Their width and height are 0 (all of its contents escape outside). If
> you examine the elements in Firebug you see something similar: The ULs
> are dimmed (noting that they aren't visible).
>
> What are you trying to create?
>
> --John
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Alexandre Plennevaux
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I have a strange rendering bug occuring since upgrading to 1.3.2 from
>> 1.3.1 and even one of the nighty release (end of january)
>>
>> i have a (very complex) menu, marked up with unordered lists.
>> Interaction with it toggles classes so that only the relevant ones are shown.
>>
>> at some point i test how many are visible using
>>
>> $('#stratas ul:visible').length;
>>
>>
>> with 1.3.1 it returned the correct number, but with 1.3.2 it does not
>> anymore. It seems related to the css code.
>>
>> i've built a test suite here :  http://jsbin.com/ovogu
>>
>> Let me know if i should file a bug or if it's something i am doing wrong.
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
>> Alexandre
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Andrea Giammarchi
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Ok, I tried :D
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 4:09 PM, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Heh, that's not happening, no.
>>>>
>>>> If we drop support for IE6 we might as well drop support for IE7 - we
>>>> have more bugs that we have to work around in IE7 than we do in IE6 -
>>>> and considering that there were no significant JavaScript/DOM bugs
>>>> fixed in IE7 - it's virtually identical to IE6, as far as we're
>>>> concerned.
>>>>
>>>> Unlike IE 5.5, which has some critical errors in its construction, we
>>>> plan on supporting IE 6 well into the foreseeable future.
>>>>
>>>> --John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> > Good Stuff Guys, but I wonder when you'll decide to put the word END in
>>>> > front of "Supports IE6" ... any chance libraries will start to do it and
>>>> > accordingly remove dust and rubbish from their core?
>>>> >
>>>> > An announcement like: jQuery 1.4 will not support IE6 ... is it too much
>>>> > to
>>>> > ask, isn't it?
>>>> >
>>>> > :-)
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 1:59 PM, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Yep, the team at Microsoft is working on it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --John
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 8:57 AM, jerone <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Good work.
>>>> >> > Visual Studio version comming soon?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > gr J
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On 21 feb, 02:05, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> >> >> Hi Everyone -
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Full details here:http://docs.jquery.com/Release:jQuery_1.3.2
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Enjoy!
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> --John
>>>> >> > >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >
>>>
>>
>> >
>>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to