fwiw, I dont think it is time to drop ie6 support yet. Some organizations require ie6 support, which would mean that they cannot adopt jquery. Give it another year.
On Feb 21, 5:39 pm, Daniel Friesen <[email protected]> wrote: > Wasn't the memory leak issue IE<=6 only? I thought that was fixed in 7. > That is a fairly big portion of compatibility code, half the library > uses less efficient techniques to avoid memory leaks. > > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com] > -Nadir-Point & Wiki-Tools (http://nadir-point.com) (http://wiki-tools.com) > -MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.org) > -Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com) > -Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com) > -Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com) > > Andrea Giammarchi wrote: > > Diego, > > it's just about pushing "from inside" to remove that obsolete browser from > > the web. > > John already explained the fact that IE6 tricks are almost the same (Sizzle > > as well?) > > > Anyway, it was just a try :-) > > > On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Diego Perini <[email protected]>wrote: > > >> Andrea, > >> dropping support for IE6 will not help reduce the code in any way. The > >> same part of code is still needed in both IE7 and IE8. > > >> What are the advantages in only have support for IE7 and IE8 ? > > >> Diego --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
