Maybe because we removed: length:0,
from jQuery's prototype ? -- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com On Mar 5, 12:40 am, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: > It's supposed to be - and this was a change in Firebug, not in jQuery > - it was actually a regression in Firebug that this no longer worked. > > --John > > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Ricardo Tomasi <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why is it that Firebug reports jQuery objects as simple arrays in > > 1.3.2? 1.2.6 always returned me the actual jQuery object. Is this a > > bug (i'm on Firefox 3.0.7) or is it supposed to be this way? How can I > > inspect the actual object? > > > - ricardo > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
