Each instance gets a length within $.fn.init, no exception. So that prop was redundant. It might also made the proto un-iterable back then when I needed to do that.
So, why re-add it ? On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <[email protected]> wrote: > Since every call to jQuery returns an ArrayLike instance I think you should > put back the length:0 into the prototype (could be also useful to understand > different instances via constructors prototype). > > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Ariel Flesler <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Maybe because we removed: >> >> length:0, >> >> from jQuery's prototype ? >> >> -- >> Ariel Flesler >> http://flesler.blogspot.com >> >> On Mar 5, 12:40 am, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: >> > It's supposed to be - and this was a change in Firebug, not in jQuery >> > - it was actually a regression in Firebug that this no longer worked. >> > >> > --John >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Ricardo Tomasi <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Why is it that Firebug reports jQuery objects as simple arrays in >> > > 1.3.2? 1.2.6 always returned me the actual jQuery object. Is this a >> > > bug (i'm on Firefox 3.0.7) or is it supposed to be this way? How can I >> > > inspect the actual object? >> > >> > > - ricardo >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Ariel Flesler http://flesler.blogspot.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
