oooh, nice! "Because I was sick of clicking on green object links to see what is contained in jQuery expressions"
That's exactly why I, for one, am very happy to see the old array notation for jQuery objects back in Firebug. --Karl ____________ Karl Swedberg www.englishrules.com www.learningjquery.com On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:05 AM, Antonin Hildebrand wrote: > > I think jQuery community would deserve special support in Firebug. > > I mean something going this direction: > http://github.com/darwin/firequery/tree/master > > Any Firefox/XUL guru willing to help on this? > > regards, > Antonin aka Darwin > > On Mar 5, 5:10 pm, ricardobeat <[email protected]> wrote: >> Right... but it's still an object, not an array, regardless of it's >> mimics. Doesn't seem right. >> >> (btw is right-click/inspect in DOM tab on one of the brackets the >> only >> way to inspect the object?) >> >> thanks, >> - ricardo >> >> On Mar 5, 12:40 am, John Resig <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> It's supposed to be - and this was a change in Firebug, not in >>> jQuery >>> - it was actually a regression in Firebug that this no longer >>> worked. >> >>> --John >> >>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Ricardo Tomasi >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>>> Why is it that Firebug reports jQuery objects as simple arrays in >>>> 1.3.2? 1.2.6 always returned me the actual jQuery object. Is this a >>>> bug (i'm on Firefox 3.0.7) or is it supposed to be this way? How >>>> can I >>>> inspect the actual object? >> >>>> - ricardo > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
