1 min ago I tried to browse to your "problem page", and I got big fat red box from AVG saying :
Accessed file is infected! File Name: icvbook.creative-area.net/ Threat Name: Exploit Grom Sploit etc ... I can send you a screen dump ... On Apr 7, 3:28 pm, DBJDBJ <[email protected]> wrote: > Well I had to state the obvious, so that we are sure we can help you > if you cooperate with the doctors ;o) > > Also. Youe experience is telling you the right thing: you need a pair > of fresh eyes. > > And a simpler page that shows the same problem. > " ... is there any tool > out there to extract the actual generated HTML.." > I always use "File --> Save Page As" from the browser. > Which I then vivisect in VisualStudio debugger. > > BTW: when you point your IE6/7 tohttp://dbjsystems.com/jq/, the > jQuery.support.boxModel is false, yes ? jQ can not gurantee consistent > positioning and dimensioning if boxModel is false. I suppose ... > > --DBJ > > On Apr 7, 1:00 pm, Julian Aubourg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I know that, DBJ and that's the whole problem for me : I was strictly unable > > to trigger the bug on simpler pages. So, basically, I have to strip down the > > current one which is full of generated html, initialization javascript & > > jsonp requests. Oh joy! Thing is I have no clue what "could" cause the > > problem. At all. I just posted the whole page here so that:1) you could all > > see there actually was a bug, > > 2) maybe something's so stupid in my page someone with more experience than > > I have will immediately intuite it. > > > I'm in the process of breaking down the page anyway (had to work on > > something else first but thought Brian or yourself would like to have a > > glance at what was wrong asap). > > > Talking of the daunting task of breaking down the monster, is there any tool > > out there to extract the actual generated HTML and toy with it (especially > > when it comes to IE)? > > > Again, I'm really sorry about the complexity of the page but I'm really > > stuck here. By all means, let me know if you see any mean/technique/approach > > that I could follow. That's the first time I have such an evasive & blocking > > bug jumping at my face in 24 years of programming (and that's counting a > > memory leak in a C/Prolog application with no proper memory inspection tools > > back in the days). > > > Never thought I'd miss those days Oo > > > -- Julian > > > 2009/4/7 DBJDBJ <[email protected]> > > > > Julian , you have to present *much* simpler example ... We can not > > > debug your html + css, sorry. > > > > On Apr 6, 10:27 am, Julian Aubourg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > >http://icvbook.creative-area.net/ > > > > login: [email protected] / pass: jquerydev > > > > > Just try with IE7 and you'll see the problem when drag&dropping widgets > > > > (easywidgets 2.0). It works perfectly as long as you keep the vertical > > > > scrollbar to the top but goes berserk if you scroll even a little before > > > > dragging. > > > > > This IS a problem with .offset() since the popup lib uses the fix I > > > talked > > > > about earlier (that is to add the .scrollTop & .scrollLeft of the > > > $("html") > > > > element to get the right position for an element -- .scrollTop() and > > > > .scrollLeft() don't seem to give proper results on the $(window) > > > > object). > > > > > I already tried to remove the xml prolog and switched to any doctype > > > > possible to no avail... This works on any other browser and worked on IE > > > > with 1.2.6. > > > > > I guess there's something wrong with the html structure but I can't find > > > it. > > > > > So, if anyone sees something jumping at his/her face, you'll be my hero > > > > ! > > > > > -- Julian > > > > > 2009/4/2 DBJDBJ <[email protected]> > > > > > > Ok, have you tried removing the xml prolog AND having this doctype > > > > > > <!DOCTYPE html> > > > > > > only ? > > > > > > Also :http://dbjsystems.com/jq/, take from it the very simple html > > > > > +jQ code, that displays the values of the jQuery.support and add it to > > > > > your problem page. I am curious what will be the boxModel result ? > > > > > With your doctype and with the one above. > > > > > > On Apr 1, 4:30 pm, Julian Aubourg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I DID remove the prolog to no avail. > > > > > > > 2009/4/1 DBJDBJ <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Remove this: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?> > > > > > > > > An XML Declaration does trigger “Quirks Mode” in IE and unless the > > > > > > > document is sent as XML, e.g., application/xhtml+xml, in the > > > Content > > > > > > > Type there isn’t any benefit. > > > > > > > > The HTML 5 DocType <!DOCTYPE html> triggers standards-compliant > > > mode > > > > > > > because it is not recognized. Please read the table in > > > > > > > >http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms535242(VS.85).aspx > > > > > > > > and note that an “Unrecognized DOCTYPE”, i.e., <!DOCTYPE html>, > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > “On” (for standards-compliant mode). > > > > > > > > Also in presence of <!DOCTYPE html > all other browsers will > > > > > > > nicely > > > > > > > switch to "standards mode" ... Try. > > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 12:54 pm, Julian Aubourg <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I seriously doubt it given:1) It works in every other browser > > > > > > > > (PC > > > and > > > > > MAC > > > > > > > > versions) > > > > > > > > 2) It worked with 1.2.7 > > > > > > > > > But in case: > > > > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!DOCTYPE html > > > > > > > > PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > > > > > > > > "http://www.w3c.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> > > > > > > > > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="fr"> > > > > > > > > > Now I'm trying to get a dumbed down example because it's > > > > > > > > actually > > > > > > > happening > > > > > > > > in the popup plugin I wrote and I doubt it would be really > > > usefull if > > > > > I > > > > > > > > dumped 1K lines of js code ;) > > > > > > > > > I'm looking into the DOM structure with firebug and try & make a > > > > > minimal > > > > > > > > example. I'll get back to you asap Brian. > > > > > > > > > 2009/4/1 DBJDBJ <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > It seems you have a <!DOCTYPE >"issue" ? > > > > > > > > > That is if !DOCTYPE is changed to a proper one, things of this > > > sort > > > > > > > > > will start appearing, very soon ;o) > > > > > > > > > > For my team I have prepared this "quick jQ 1.3.X reminder" > > > page: > > > > > > > > > >http://dbjsystems.com/jq/ > > > > > > > > > > PS: which is still called "quick test" ... ;o( > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 1, 12:29 pm, Brandon Aaron <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Could you show me the markup of the page that you are having > > > > > these > > > > > > > issues > > > > > > > > > > on? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Brandon Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Julian Aubourg < > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if something changed with the 1.3.2 version > > > shared > > > > > on > > > > > > > > > google > > > > > > > > > > > but the viewport size is now correct Oo. > > > > > > > > > > > Anyway, I have a couple more problems (though I found > > > > > workarounds). > > > > > > > > > They > > > > > > > > > > > are all IE only (tested on IE7): > > > > > > > > > > > > 1) $(window).scrollTop() and .scrollLeft() do not work. > > > > > > > > > > > You > > > > > have to > > > > > > > do > > > > > > > > > > > $("html").scrollTop() & .scrollLeft() respectively. > > > > > > > > > > > 2) element.offset() doesn't take scrolls into account (I'm > > > > > pretty > > > > > > > > > confident > > > > > > > > > > > it is linked to bug #1). So you have to manually add > > > > > > > > > $("html").scrollTop() & > > > > > > > > > > > .scrollLeft() to have the correct coords. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- Julian > > > > > > > > > > > > 2009/3/30 Brandon Aaron <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > >> You could pull in the window logic from 1.2.6 ( > > > > > > > > > > >>http://dev.jquery.com/browser/tags/1.2.6/src/core.js#L1338 > > > ) > > > > > into > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >> 1.3.2 release ( > > > >http://dev.jquery.com/browser/tags/1.3.2/src/dimensions.js#L25 > > > > > ). > > > > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > > > > >> Brandon Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Julian Aubourg < > > > > > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Thanks for the quick answer Brandon. > > > > > > > > > > >>> And yes, I can live with a nightly build though, as you > > > can > > > > > > > imagine, > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > >>> client is like not understanding what's taking so long > > > (go > > > > > > > explain > > > > > > > > > the joy > > > > > > > > > > >>> of version migration to a client!). Any timeframe? I > > > could > > > > > also > > > > > > > live > > > > > > > > > with an > > > > > > > > > > >>> ugly workaround until it's done if you happen to have > > > one. > > > > > > > > > > > >>> -- Julian > > > > > > > > > > > >>> 2009/3/30 Brandon Aaron <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> There is a bug open on window dimensions in jQuery > > > 1.3.x... > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately > > > > > > > > > > >>>> it looks like we have a gap in unit tests that allowed > > > this > > > > > > > > > regression to > > > > > > > > > > >>>> occur. It looks like it happened in r5985. It will be > > > fixed > > > > > for > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > 1.3.3 > > > > > > > > > > >>>> release but I'm unsure when that release will happen > > > right > > > > > now. > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > should be > > > > > > > > > > >>>> able to allocate some time to fix this issue soon > > > > > > > > > > >>>> though > > > if > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > don't mind > > > > > > > > > > >>>> using a nightly build once it is fixed. > > > > > > > > > > >>>> -- > > > > > > > > > > >>>> Brandon Aaron > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Julian Aubourg < > > > > > > > > > > >>>> [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> I'm in the process of migrating a site from 1.2.7 to > > > 1.3.2. > > > > > > > > > > > >>>>> So far, I just ran into a bug in > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
