I'm not seeing any functionality that can't already be done. It might
take off a few lines of code, but this doesn't really add anything
useful. If it allowed namespaces and the ability to use 'this' inside
the namespaces as you would in jQuery, then I, for one, would find it
very useful.
On Aug 12, 9:40 am, Andrea Giammarchi <andrea.giammar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> that is why I already use Obejct.create in vice-versa only if not defined
> and when it will be standard the jQuery way will be simply this one:
>
> $.extends(Object.create(proto), props);
>
> the bedge callback was just an optimized suggestion over a snipped based on
> a dated proposal.
>
> Regards
>
> P.S. not sure if Object.create will support directly the extra argument, I
> have implemented it without classic toString and other failures
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Daniel Friesen
> <nadir.seen.f...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > ES5 + .extend is not necessary for this simple chunk.
>
> > (function($){
> > if (!Object.create)
> > var F = function(){};
> > $.beget = function (proto, props) {
> > if(Object.create)
> > var o = Object.create(proto);
> > else {
> > F.prototype = proto;
> > var o = new F;
> > }
> > for ( var k in props )
> > o[k] = props[k];
> > return o;
> > };
> > })(jQuery);
>
> > ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://daniel.friesen.name]
>
> > Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> > > Dunno how many times that bedge has been optimized ;-)
>
> > > (function(){
> > > var F = function(){};
> > > jQuery.beget = function (proto, props) {
> > > F.prototype = proto;
> > > return props ? $.extend(new F, props) : new F;
> > > };
> > > })();
>
> > > Regards
>
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Már Örlygsson
> > > <mar.orlygs...@gmail.com <mailto:mar.orlygs...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> > > Hi.
> > > If it hasn't been already considered (and rejected), I'd like to
> > float
> > > the idea of adding support for prototypal inheritance into the jQuery
> > > core library.
>
> > > Something like this...
>
> > > jQuery.beget = function (proto, props) {
> > > var F = function () {};
> > > F.prototype = proto;
> > > var instance = new F();
> > > return props ? $.extend(instance, props) : instance;
> > > };
>
> > > ...becomes immensely powerful - especially during plugin development
> > > when allowing users to extend/override default options
>
> > > options = $.beget($.myplugin.defaults, options || {});
>
> > > ...and in various other common use cases - including $.fn.data()
> > > assignments, etc.
>
> > > I for one would love to see this feature added.
>
> > > --
> > > Már
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
