> It is as understandable to consider that an empty string signifies an
> empty selector, so we return the current object, which is document, as
> to consider that an empty html string.
mmmkay, but that begs the question
why doesnt isn't this
$('', document); // [ document ]
then equivalent to
$(document).find(''); // [ ]
If $() is defined to always return an empty collection there's no need
to distinguish between '' the selector and '' the html.
(same should go for other falsy values IMO)
--
Már
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"jQuery Development" group.
To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
