> > For this idea to be taken seriously, I think you would need to > > create such a version and benchmark it VS the all-in-one > > jQuery.js. > > IF you can show significant performance differences, then > > perhaps your idea could gain some traction
> You're right. I'll make tests as soon as possible, and inform > you whether it is significant or not. > > The reasons why I did this topic was because before I used > jQuery, I had to to develop all myself and the dragging and > selecting were significantly faster. > I conjectured that it was because of the compatibility > additions, but I have to verify it myself before asking you > such a feature. My gut sense is that the feature tests probably have only a miniscule impact on the speed of your code. There are so many other things that can make your own jQuery code slow. Slow selectors, slow loops, there are a lot of possible culprits. The good news is that you can probably speed things up considerably just by making some changes in your own code. If you can post a test page that demonstrates what is too slow, I'm sure someone will be able to give you some tips on speeding it up. (Post it to the regular jQuery group, not the dev group.) -Mike --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
