Have you seen sizzle? The main core component that could make the difference since jQuery is mainly based on selectors and arrays manipulation? Try to imagine sizzle was called jQuery.core.selector, I think makes sense to start from the main dependency that could bring benefits for everyone, even non jQuery users. But this is just my opinion.
On Aug 24, 2009 4:33 PM, "DBJDBJ" <dbj...@gmail.com> wrote: I thought my original aim was simple ? I just thought it might be proven feasible to have one jQuery for IE, and one jQuery for others ... The team is building jQuery already, using tools , so (I thought) the same tools might be used to build these non-ie and ie versions, also. And then tests can be done , using the same testing infrastructure ... This is of-course not an "zero effort" excersize, but I think we all agree that the non-ie version will be measurably faster on on non-ie browsers than the original "mix-in-everything" version. And the same will happen with ie-only version on ie browsers. --DBJ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subs... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jQuery Development" group. To post to this group, send email to jquery-dev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to jquery-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jquery-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
