We'd have to mark them as spam via the gmail web client though, right? I
use Thunderbird to get my gmail. I almost never visit the actual gmail
web client. :o'
Chris
(J)(a)(k)(e) wrote:
Jean, It's a valid fear... but have no fear! those google boys are
(t)here!
I've marked all the spam, as it comes in and the new spam from the
same guy goes directly to spam!
On 5/21/07, *Jean Nascimento* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Exactly dont reply this spamers
i was affraid to mark spam and the all list beeing marked
On 5/21/07, Benjamin Sterling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> I agree with Jake, but we need not reply to those spam mails
because I have
> found that those people who reply get lumped into the spam
filter and gets
> put in the spam folder.
>
>
> On 5/21/07, Jonathan Sharp < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> > here here!
> >
> > -js
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/21/07, â'¿â"?â"s(â"" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> > > Gmail deals pretty well with spam, but it has to be told!
> > >
> > > I mark the spam messages as spam. Gmail gets the idea, and
the abuser's
> mail is all marked spam.
> > >
> > > If enough people using gmail, just mark the spam as spam...
every gmail
> user will have the spam thrown into the spam folder. (I think!)
> > >
> > > Responding to spam, no matter how funny or ridiculous , just
makes
> things worse.
> > >
> > > --
> > > â'¿â"?â"s(â"" - ×^(TM)עק×' Ê?Ç¡Ç©È© áZ(«áZ(ªá?¦áZ(¬
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Benjamin Sterling
> http://www.KenzoMedia.com
> http://www.KenzoHosting.com
--
[]´s Jean
www.suissa.info <http://www.suissa.info>
Ethereal Agency
www.etherealagency.com <http://www.etherealagency.com>
--
â'¿â"?â"s(â"" - ×^(TM)עק×' Ê?Ç¡Ç©È© áZ(«áZ(ªá?¦áZ(¬
--
http://www.cjordan.us
