On 6/12/07, Rey Bango <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:- We can increase selector speeds at the expense of file size
How about looking at this specifically a little closer? It's already been pointed out that jQuery could get a lot bigger and /still/ remain the smallest library. So, the question is why 20k? I'm not saying damn the filesize, but let's just say that some test comes out which does illustrated a /significant/ deficiency which is being brought about by the filesize restriction. What would the argument then be for staying at 20k? Is the goal "keep the library small" or "keep the library at 20k?" And if the latter, what is the basis for that number?
