Hi Mike

> Betreff: [jQuery] Re: AW: [jQuery] Re: http://:/ issue?
> 
> 
> I don't see it happening here. This is the URL list I got 
> using IE7 and
> Fiddler2:

[...]

> No funny /:/ in the list. Not sure what that is about or why 
> you're seeing it. What tool are you using to watch the traffic?

I'm using HTTP Analyzer from:
http://www.ieinspector.com/

The IE 7 really tries to call http://:/ and this ends in
not finish loading the page. It's not only a traffic tool
issue.

I also removed any other JS and CSS and it still happens 
with only jquery.js and no other css or javascript.

It's really bad because the thickbox page shows up without
any layout if this happens.

I also have to say, that I've the multi version IE installed
next to the IE 7. But the IE 7 installation is the original one.
But I don't think that has to do with the issue.

Regards
Roger Ineichen
_____________________________
END OF MESSAGE


> -Mike
> 
> > From: Roger Ineichen
> > 
> > I see it on different pages. Here is one:
> > http://alpha.z3c.org/
> > 
> > It happens with JQuery packed or full version, also with version 
> > 1.1.3.1. or 1.1.2
> > 
> > I have this issue only with IE7.
> > 
> > Here's a traffic report. See no. 5 after jquery.pack.js:
> > 
> > 1    10:36:42:421  0.234 s      GET     200     7.06 K    
> >   text/html                 http://alpha.z3c.org/
> > 
> > 2    10:36:42:656  0.172 s      GET     200     10.70 K   
> >   application/x-javascript  http://alpha.z3c.org/@@/xmlhttp.js
> > 
> > 3    10:36:42:843  0.109 s      GET     200     6.89 K    
> >   application/x-javascript  http://alpha.z3c.org/@@/json.js
> > 
> > 4    10:36:42:968  0.249 s      GET     200     21.04 K   
> >   application/x-javascript  http://alpha.z3c.org/@@/jquery.pack.js
> > 
> > 5    10:36:43:265  0.000 s      GET             0         
> >   (None)                    http://:/
> > 
> > 6    10:36:43:265  0.078 s      GET     200     2.60 K    
> >   application/x-javascript
> > http://alpha.z3c.org/@@/jsonform.validate.js
> > 
> > ...
> 
> 

Reply via email to