I'll try Jörn's. The only thing that gave me pause on that one was the number of dependencies.
On Feb 13, 6:15 pm, Jack Killpatrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also decided to use that one (Jörn's) after evaluating 4 or 5 others. > As you (timothy) noticed, many of the solutions borrowed from each > other, but that one seemed to have the best aggregate of features from > them all and some of the others looked like they might have been > stagnating. It has also proven (to me) to be quite stable and easy to > work with, although I'm using client side data, not ajax-loaded data, so > can't vouch for that. > > - Jack > > Diego A. wrote: > > I use: > >http://bassistance.de/jquery-plugins/jquery-plugin-autocomplete/ > > > I made this decision a few months ago, but I remember going through 4 > > or 5 options (I even considered writing my own), but in the end I > > chose the option that I thought was most likely to see future > > development and support. > > > On Feb 13, 6:47 pm, timothytoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I searched google for "jquery autocompletion" and was overwhelmed by > >> the choices. Looks like people have been borrowing heavily back and > >> forth to get the best solution. > > >> Has anyone gone through the choices recently and selected one? If so, > >> which did you choose and why? > > >> I'd like to use it for both local and Ajax server data.
