Just bumping this from the weekend Again, Thanks
On Apr 19, 9:16 am, Geoffrey <geoffreykjqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > $.live and Live Query are both wonderful. I am hoping to put them to > extensive use in my projects. > > I have a few questions about $.live and Live Query and their effect on > performance. > > Background: If I recall correctly, the original release of Live Query > could have some performance problems. I don't remember if things > bogged down when the DOM had a lot of elements, when you added a large > number of Live Query events, did a lot of updating or exactly what. > > Question 1: > What were the specific concerns around performance with the 1.0.x > releases of Live Query? > > Now with jquey 1.3, there is $.live. $.live does not do everything > that Live Query does, but does do some of it. > > Question 2: > Does $.live use a different technique for handling events than Live > Query? > > Question 2a: > If it is different, are there any performance concerns using $.live > like there used to be with Live Query? > > Live Query 1.1.x requires jquery 1.3. I am guessing that the new > version uses $.live internally. > > Question 3a: > Is the performance of Live Query better in the 1.1.x version? > > Question 3b: > Are there some selectors that have better performance than others? or > to say it another way, do all of the selectors perform the same or, > for example, does > $('input').livequery('click', function() { }); > perform better than > $('input').livequery('change', function() { });? > > Using $.live or Live Query. > Question 4: > Is there any difference in performce between using > $('input').livequery('click', function() { }); > vs > $("input").live("click", function(){ });? > > I am thinking of really diving in to using $.live and/or Live Query. I > am trying to get a complete understanding of all of the issues that > may arise. > > Thanks > -Geoff