On 3/29/06, Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just committed a change to create additional ruby_case aliases for all camelCase Java methods in included classes.

It feels right when your head is coding in ruby mode, but I don't know that it adds all that much, and actually obscures the portions of the code that uses java objects.  Also, what sort of overhead does all the extra aliases provide? 

I think it looks pretty cool though, and I'd like to have it on by default. How nice is:

f.set_size(200, 200)

I meant to ask you last night Charlie why you don't create, e.g., :size= methods for Java setters?  That's one rubyism that I think would be nice to add, since you already add reader methods for Java getters.

Thoughts?
 
Any chance you could get the ruby_case behavior through an additional require?

/Nick

Reply via email to