On Friday 31 March 2006 08:52 am, Thomas E Enebo wrote: > This is prone to the same problem that took us away > from lazy instantiation in the first place. Namely, if > you define a method in Kernel or Object matching the camel > case name that you are hoping will be lazily created, then > method_missing will not be called. > > Perhaps, this is ok for camel case methods? David, you ran > into this...Perhaps you can weigh in about likelyhood? If there > can be no such sollision, then this solution will not work...
I think you're right. lazy initialization is frought with peril :) I'd suggest, that it be disabled by default, but overridable by a "global" variable applied at time of 'include_class'. Then, we can have file 'ruby_cased_java' that looks liked this: Java.enable_ruby_case require 'java' Voila. The best of all worlds. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
