I will try and hand merge this one this afternoon. I am wondering if since we are going down the road of some of StringIO being Java-based we don't just go the whole distance and make it all Java (like our core classes)? Thoughts? This will be faster and it is bound to be a performance bottleneck.
-Tom On Wed, 10 May 2006, Ola Bini defenestrated me: > Hi! > > Since the former StringIO implementation were not updated and working > correctly, I took the liberty to write a new version, backed by a Java > class that uses > a StringBuffer internally. > I've attached the new stringio.rb and StringIOImpl.java which should go in > org.jruby.util > > This seems to be the problem with RbYAML too, and I attach the new yaml.rb > for people to try out. RbYAML have to be put in lib/ruby/1.8 for some > reason, instead of builtin, where yaml.rb should go. > > Regards > Ola Bini -- + http://www.tc.umn.edu/~enebo +---- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ----+ | Thomas E Enebo, Protagonist | "Luck favors the prepared | | | mind." -Louis Pasteur | ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Jruby-devel mailing list Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
