Hi
Yes, I've tried it, and it works fine. I don't have any timing info on
this, though.
/O
----- Original Message -----
From: Charles O Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, June 11, 2006 9:21 pm
Subject: Re: [Jruby-devel] New StringIO.
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Excellent! Tried it with RubyGems yet?
>
> On 6/11/06, Ola Bini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > So, I've been spending some time implementing a pure Java StringIO
> > (which this time actually passes the test cases... =)
> >
> > I also did a little timing test, with operations taken directly
> from the
> > pick axe.
> > I did these 10_000 times for the old and the new implementations:
> > sio = StringIO.new("time flies like an arrow")
> > sio.read(5)
> > sio.read(5)
> > sio.pos = 18
> > sio.read(5)
> > sio.rewind
> > sio.write("fruit")
> > sio.pos=16
> > sio.write("a banana")
> > sio.rewind
> > sio.read
> >
> > And got this output:
> > Doing the operations with old StringIO 10000 times took 6409.0 milli
> > seconds
> > Doing the operations with new StringIO 10000 times took 791.0 milli
> > seconds
> >
> > Which looks good, about 8 times increase. Should be welcome in some
> > places, neh?
> >
> > The files attached are two classes, org.jruby.RubyStringIO, and
> > org.jruby.libraries.StringIOLibrary, and a patch for org.jruby.Ruby
> >
> > Regards
> > Ola Bini
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jruby-devel mailing list
> > Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
> JRuby Developer @ jruby.sourceforge.net
> Application Architect @ www.ventera.com
>
_______________________________________________
Jruby-devel mailing list
Jruby-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jruby-devel
