by the way,

there a wiki page:
http://www.headius.com/jrubywiki/index.php?title=Rails_Integration_Configuration_discussion&action=edit

where we intended to collect and discuss all new proposals to GoldSpike
(to config and beyond) but I've never get to fill it with the past proposals
because of a common disease called "only got 24 hours a day" :)

Fausto


On 5/28/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems to me there may be many other good ways to implement GoldSpike.
> Whether it's the configuration format, the way rails maps to a servlet
> engine (or no servlet engine at all, as in the Grizzly Rails module), or
> how it retrieves, allocates, and manages resources (including JRuby
> instances), there's a lot of variability here.
>
> It also seems to me that GoldSpike has become somewhat set in its ways.
> It has had a 1.0 release already (somewhat prematurely, in my opinion)
> and although it seems to be working really well, a 1.0 release always
> seems to kill new innovations.
>
> I propose a friendly fork of GoldSpike in the same repository, to allow
> more drastic changes to be experimented with, and potentially full
> rewrites of key pieces to happen. This would continue to live under the
> jruby-extras umbrella, and would be regarded as a research project.
> There's always the possibility the changes would be excellent, and the
> new GoldSpike would become *the* GoldSpike, but at the very least it
> seems like we need more diversity in this area.
>
> Remember folks, the OSS rule is that your implementation is worse than
> the one coming tomorrow, and more diversity is a net gain for the
> project as a whole. We need to foster more diversity in the area of
> rails-in-a-WAR-file.
>
> So who would be interested in making the fork and running away with it?
> I know a few of you have had good ideas that maybe didn't fit well into
> the current GoldSpike design. If you have commit rights, I highly
> recommend you pull off a branch and try your ideas out, and invite
> others to join in or do the same.
>
> - Charlie
> _______________________________________________
> Jruby-extras-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/jruby-extras-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Jruby-extras-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/jruby-extras-devel

Reply via email to