I don't see why not, althought it is more of "rails servlet" than a "ruby servlet". There's some rails specific assumption as it stands now. Do you mean factor out those too ?
F. On 5/28/07, Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Fausto Lelli wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm sorry to put in my opinion before Robert's but it always seemed to me > > that the "java_servlet-rails" bridge related classes could be extracted off > > to > > a new common project, and deployment related things to a bunch of > > container-specific subprojects (or completely different project, but > > I'd say subprojects). > > > > The "java_servlet-rails" bridge could even come in the form of a jruby-gem. > > There's been some discussion and work in the JRuby side of things for a > generic "ruby servlet" that could fit this description. Perhaps there's > something here that could be made "standard" and other things (like > GoldSpike v2) could build upon that? > > - Charlie > _______________________________________________ > Jruby-extras-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/jruby-extras-devel > _______________________________________________ Jruby-extras-devel mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/jruby-extras-devel
