Ah, I definitely want to learn from this Alan - why would this be premature? I'm happy to delay it as well. I'm just trying to learn why...
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Jeremy Haile <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm completely open to delaying the vote. However, I am curious as to your > thoughts. Do you think there are more opinions out there? Or that we > haven't fully discussed it? > > I started to feel like we were going in circles, repeating the same > arguments over and over. And no one new was contributing opinions. That's > why I suggested the vote. > > > On Jul 11, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: > >> With my champion/mentor hat on I would have to say that this vote is >> premature. >> >> >> Regards, >> Alan >> >> On Jul 11, 2008, at 8:52 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: >> >>> I'm calling for a vote to use a thin wrapper API (that already exists, >>> just not integrated) as our components' primary interface for logging >>> functionality. This would not be a logging framework, but just simply >>> delegate to any implementation: Commons Logging, SLF4J, etc. >>> >>> +1 will be a vote in favor of incorporating this change. >>> -1 will be a vote in favor of NOT incorporating this change. >>> 0 will be the usual abstain vote. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Les >>> >> > >
