> This is my understanding of the proposal too. If the user doesn't want
> to worry about logging, they get the embedded slf4j-api + simple
> logger, or maybe JDK logger for Java 1.4+. If they want pluggable
> logging, then they need the JSecurity distribution without the
> embedded slf4j-api.

I'm currently +1 for this proposal, and +0 for the implementation in
the repository, even though a vote hasn't been called yet :)

Peter

Reply via email to