On Jul 15, 2008, at 9:23 AM, Peter Ledbrook wrote:

This is my understanding of the proposal too. If the user doesn't want
to worry about logging, they get the embedded slf4j-api + simple
logger, or maybe JDK logger for Java 1.4+. If they want pluggable
logging, then they need the JSecurity distribution without the
embedded slf4j-api.

I'm currently +1 for this proposal, and +0 for the implementation in
the repository, even though a vote hasn't been called yet :)


+1 as well.

+1 for the other implementation being in the repsitory. It will be under a different artifact id so it should be fine.


Regards,
Alan

Reply via email to