On Dec 16, 2008, at 6:22 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

I'm slowly catching up on emails, so please forgive the delay ;)

Heh heh, please forgive my delay.  :)

I'm not quite sure of the usage patterns of Crowd and its token checking,
but a clean solution might depend on the architecture.

For example, if Crowd is anything like JSecurity, the 'token' is sent over the wire attached to each RPC call and/or web request. It is then checked
on the server-side for validity.  If not valid, it throws a specific
exception indicating why it failed, preventing the invocation/ request/etc.

A more performant mechansim would probably be, on the client side (I'm
calling the CrowdRealm the 'client side' and the Crowd Server the 'server side' in this example), to just send the token across the wire each time in conjunction with the intended request, without checking its validity first.

Then the filter or method interceptor on the client side would check for an specific exception thrown by the server side related to token invalidity and then show the user something that explains why the request/ invocation failed
(e.g. redirect to a nice page or show a popup dialog, etc).

You'd have to show this information anyway if you proactively checked the
token.  Why go through the 'hit' of checking token validity before an
invocation starts when that valididty will be checked by the server anyway?
Seems like one more round-trip hop that can be avoided.

Of course, this assumes that checking validity requires a server- side call. If not, that proactive checking might be viable, but I don't know how Crowd
works...

Your initial thoughts are along the same lines as mine. The validity of the ticket is tested by a peer on first arrival. This test involves communication with the Crowd server and can be considered heavy weight. Usually peers will cache the result of the security check so that they will not have to subsequently check the ticket with the Crowd server.

Now, the Crowd server has a mechanism where a ticket can be invalidated. Let's say a Wall Street trader has been let go and his privileges have to be removed immediately rather than wait until all his tickets expire. Any subsequent security checks against the Crowd server will fail. But remember that a peer may be caching the initial security check results. What to do? One simple solution is to have the peer do a security check w/ the Crowd server for every call it receives; obviously a resource intensive solution. A different solution would be to have the peer check after some period, say five minutes. This could be an acceptable compromise.

Jeremy's idea of using a CrowdFilter that would have its security check period configurable sounds like the way to go.

Hope this explains my current thinking.


Regards,
Alan



On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Jeremy Haile <[email protected]> wrote:

Yeah - I think the mixup was largely on the user of the word "credential"
We use that word to mean the "secret" information used during
authentication, such as a password or private key. In this case, in the JSecurity parlance I would probably store the token as a "principal" via the
CrowdRealm.

I agree that checking the validity of a token is a common security pattern, especially for SSO setups. I also like the idea of providing some easy hook or way to do this in the JSecurity core. It seems to me that this should
somehow fit in as a custom CrowdFilter that is plugged into the
JSecurityFilter and has the ability to route the user to a login URL if the token is no longer valid - or perhaps to simply expire the users session if the token is invalid, thus letting a later filter route the user to the
login URL based on the invalid (and now unauthenticated) session.

Jeremy




On Nov 24, 2008, at 10:10 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:

Crowd calls its a token I would probably call it a ticket.  There's a
method in the Crowd API that you can call to make sure the ticket is still good. The ticket is a handle to a "login session" at the Crowd server. You can invalidate that session using the Crowd console to the Crowd server and, so, that the next time you check to see if the ticket is still good the
Crowd API will say "no".  So, you can have a filter that checks the
token/ticket for every page hit/call or after a certain period expires, say
5 minutes.

This is a fairly common security pattern; at least one that I've run into on a regular basis. I think we should include it in JSecurity proper instead of forcing people to make ad hoc solutions; not that JSecurity
doesn't provide adequate methods to do so.


Regards,
Alan

On Nov 24, 2008, at 5:51 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:

Hi Alan,

This is cool - I like seeing new realms :)

What do you mean exactly when you say "one can invalidate the token
session from the Crowd console".  What is a 'token session'?

It sounds as if this token would be a principal - an identifying
attribute of the current user.  A credential, strictly speaking, is
something that verifies a user identity by matching a known value. Is
the token really a credential?

Or perhaps it is just something attributed to the current user - not an identifying attribute like a username or SSN - I dunno. If that is the case, there's nothing wrong with just sticking it in the session either (Subject.getSession()). The only benefit of including it as a principal in the PrincipalCollection is that would be serialized as a cookie if cookies are enabled, thereby not using a session at all (can
be a good thing depending on architecture, as I'm sure you know).

In any case, I think checking it on a regular basis to make sure it is still valid is a behavior specific to Crowd, not JSecurity, so I think it makes sense to do this checking in a filter. If it extends one of
the JSecurity Filter classes, then you can do anything they can do,
like redirect to the login page, etc.

HTH,

Les

On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 4:00 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >
wrote:

So, I've checked in my first crack at a crowd based realm. I have a few
questions.

As you may have noticed, I used enums to direct the behavior of the
realm.
It's not sure to me that this will work within the framework as it now
stands.

When you log into Crowd you get a token. This token can be checked on a regular basis to make sure that it's still valid; one can invalidate the token session from the Crowd console. It's not clear to me where I can place this check in JSecurity. I'm thinking that I'll need to write my
own
filter that gets the Subject and obtains the credentials object that I returned during authentication. In this credential is the token and I
can
use that to check the validity of it.

Thoughts?


Regards,
Alan








Reply via email to