There were lots of different names proposed in the other thread earlier. But from the email archives, it thought it was inconclusive whether a new name was needed in the first place. Not saying a new name isn't needed, but just asking if there was a decision to rename the project. Though leaving marketing people aside, there's nothing wrong with a descriptive name - at least httpd comes to mind...
Kalle On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > Cool. Since no one else has proposed an alternative, I start a vote that > proposes accepting Ki as the new project name. > > > Regards, > Alan > > > On Feb 20, 2009, at 7:20 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote: > > There were some other suggestions on the other thread that I can't >> remember >> now, but none that I liked as much as 'Ki'. So that gets my vote. >> >> +1 Ki >> >> Les >> >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:05 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> >> We may as well start this thread. I recall the name "Ki" being proposed. >>> I like it a lot. It's short and concise. Are there any other >>> contenders? >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alan >>> >>> >>> >
