When you formulate the initial VOTE post, can you clarify that if anyone votes -1, that they should provide an alternate name that does NOT have a conflict in the USTO patent/trademark search?
I would like to avoid what happened before - where it turns into a brainstorming thread. If an alternate name is given as part of a -1 vote, that person should do the proper due diligence to guarantee, in as much as is possible, no conflict. If they don't do that due diligence or want to put the time in to doing it (it is time consuming, I found out), then they shouldn't have the right to nominate it, given all the time that we've had for the last few months... On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <[email protected]>wrote: > > On Feb 25, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Peter Ledbrook wrote: > > There's been ample time for people to chime in with their name proposals >>> but >>> none have been proposed other than Ki. >>> >> >> Did we consider just plain "jsec"? Anyway, I'm fine with Ki too. >> > > We can add that to the vote too. > > > Regards, > Alan > >
