On Mar 12, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Les Hazlewood wrote:
Per this thread:
http://www.jsecurity.org/node/1081#comment-289
It appears that we can't use Ki.
So far the development team seems to be happy with "Apache Security
API",
which can have (good) far reaching implications for a good quality
framework. Any objections?
I think it implies that this project is happy to include all java
security work at apache. For instance, would you be happy to include
a xamcl jacc implementation that did not use your Subject but rather
the JAAS subject? It would certainly be a java security
implementation but AFAICT has little to no overlap with what you are
doing now.
I think it also has a connotation that apache has somehow approved
your api and all projects needing java security are expected to use it.
Dunno if anyone else gets these ideas from the name but I do. And I'm
certainly not implying anything about the nature or quality of this
project.... just that naming one project for the entire field of which
it is an example may not be without problems and implications.
thanks
david jencks
- Les
