It's ok Les, I was only leg pulling, apologies for causing a distraction
rather than a titter.
Apache Ki sounds very good.
Regards,
Ben
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Hi Ben,
That might not be too fair - I at least (and I'm sure others as well) have
given proper thought to every suggestion posted on this list. Its just that
most suggestions didn't form enough consensus to move forward to a vote.
But, in any case - that's not what we're talking about in this thread -
we're talking about whether or not we should change the name yet again. :/
My thought is that, as long as it is called Apache Ki, I'm fairly certain
that no one has to worry. 'Ki' is not the official name for the project -
its just a shortcut for simple reference. The formal name is 'Apache Ki',
and as such, there can be no conflict with any other entity that is not in
the software security domain and doesn't even have Trademarks or Patents.
Regards,
Les
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote:
My misunderstanding, I was refering to possible compromise project names.
Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote:
You have had feedback, you've just ignored it :-p
>From PRC ? It might have been sent privately to Les, then. I'm
following the PRC ML and saw nothing so far ...
Do you mind posting the feedback to the jsecurity-dev ML ?
Thanks !
