No worries Ben :) I hope you enjoy using it! Cheers,
Les On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote: > It's ok Les, I was only leg pulling, apologies for causing a distraction > rather than a titter. > > Apache Ki sounds very good. > > Regards, > Ben > > Les Hazlewood wrote: > >> Hi Ben, >> >> That might not be too fair - I at least (and I'm sure others as well) have >> given proper thought to every suggestion posted on this list. Its just >> that >> most suggestions didn't form enough consensus to move forward to a vote. >> But, in any case - that's not what we're talking about in this thread - >> we're talking about whether or not we should change the name yet again. :/ >> >> My thought is that, as long as it is called Apache Ki, I'm fairly certain >> that no one has to worry. 'Ki' is not the official name for the project - >> its just a shortcut for simple reference. The formal name is 'Apache Ki', >> and as such, there can be no conflict with any other entity that is not in >> the software security domain and doesn't even have Trademarks or Patents. >> >> Regards, >> >> Les >> >> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> My misunderstanding, I was refering to possible compromise project names. >>> >>> >>> Emmanuel Lecharny wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Ben <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> You have had feedback, you've just ignored it :-p >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >From PRC ? It might have been sent privately to Les, then. I'm >>>> following the PRC ML and saw nothing so far ... >>>> >>>> Do you mind posting the feedback to the jsecurity-dev ML ? >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > >
