Yeah this really needs to get sorted out as priority #1 so the project can move forward. Changing names (and hence packages etc) really does hold up a lot of folks and may have them opt to go elsewhere. Bradley
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Maarten Bosteels <[email protected]>wrote: > I guess everyone gave up on finding a name because of the many rules, at > least I did ;-) > > regards > Maarten > > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Erik Beeson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > What's the status of the renaming? > > --Erik > > > > > > On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 10:20 PM, David Crossley <[email protected] > > >wrote: > > > > > William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > Scroll back through the original thread. The point not collisions. > > > > I have a really good chance of getting away with the software project > > > > "Apache Kleenex" because the Kleenex registration refers to a paper > > > > product, not a software product. > > > > > > > > But it does not matter that your software product only shares part of > a > > > name > > > > with another software product, or that the two types of software do > > > entirely > > > > different thing. The question is always one of confusion (deliberate > > or > > > > otherwise). > > > > > > Very good point Bill. We should expand item 3 in the list [1]. > > > > > > Jsecurity people, that is a set of guidelines that i created > > > by scouring the relevant Apache mail archives on this topic. > > > Perhaps it will help. > > > > > > [1] Choosing names for ASF projects > > > http://www.apache.org/dev/project-names.html > > > > > > -David > > > > > >
