On Feb 4, 1:24 pm, Balázs Galambosi <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Rey Bango <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please, let's focus on technical discussions here and stop with the > > posting to links that only spark up non-productive debates and add no > > value to JSMentors.. > > You mean stick to the everlasting flow of questions about jQuery this, > and jQuery that? Besides, on jsmentors.com under goals it says: "Via > the JSMentors mailing list you can: [...] Review your article on > JavaScript topic". I agree that the article has nothing new to say, > but Dmitry's post is awesome and has VALUE (even if you missed it). > It's not your list, it's a community list, used by people with > different intrests (in regards to Javascript of course). > > People are different. Please consider that. Thank you! > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:52 PM, jemptymethod <[email protected]> wrote: > > I consider this spam > > Intelligent people didn't use to reply to spam. There are probably > more than 100+ ways to delete/leave a thread. Use one.
And the trollish insinuation behind your remark is that I am not intelligent. But if you "read between the lines" you'd realize I'm trying to open a discussion as to whether these posts are spam. So we agree on that, yet you still have to insinuate I'm not intelligent? How do you know I did not also do something such as click "report as spam" within Google groups. Between the spam and your (yes, you) trolling JSMentors risks devolving into the noise-to-signal festival that is comp.lang.javascript George Jempty -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
