On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:51 PM, jemptymethod <[email protected]> wrote: > > And the trollish insinuation behind your remark is that I am not > intelligent. But if you "read between the lines" you'd realize I'm > trying to open a discussion as to whether these posts are spam. > I'm sorry I've only read "I consider this spam". You may opened the discussion in another topic but in this one you only left this one-liner.
> So we agree on that, yet you still have to insinuate I'm not intelligent? > I didn't say you're not intelligent, I only suggested what you may do if you find something to be noise. It's not nice to call one's article spam (without any reason). > But I need this group less, than this group would benefit from my > participation. > That being said, next troll who insinuates I'm not intelligent could > very well get a profanity laden response from me, and if that results > in me getting banned from the group, the group will suffer more than me. > But I need this group less, than this group would benefit from my > participation. > It's a big open place for discussion, not a club. Again, if you find something to be irrelevant to you, ignore it. Simple as that. :) He's not trying to sell viagra after all. - Balázs -- To view archived discussions from the original JSMentors Mailman list: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To search via a non-Google archive, visit here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
